Saturday, June 25, 2011

mazda rx7 fc

images Second generation (FC) mazda rx7 fc. Mazda RX7 FC. Drifting!
  • Mazda RX7 FC. Drifting!


  • karthiknv143
    08-10 06:10 PM
    Any updates from USCIS regarding lockbox & receipting dates?




    wallpaper Mazda RX7 FC. Drifting! mazda rx7 fc. 2011 Mazda Rx7 Fc. in his
  • 2011 Mazda Rx7 Fc. in his


  • Saburi
    02-26 11:30 AM
    I think dates won't (and should not ) move much. So at the end of year we can see big jump and then may be people like me can file I-1485.

    Thank's
    MDix

    I wish your prediction come true but does not seem like i don't think this que is going to move anyfurther untill next few years, i was very positive about this que will move faster after Feb 2009 but since then its still sitting to the same duration and have not move even a little, so sorry bro but does not seem like this will move untill next year.

    May be it will move few month in the end of the year but getting it current or passing 2008 i don't see it happening untill 2011.

    Sorry its bitter but true unless there is any big releaf given to us which does not seem to be hapening as Mr. Chnage has lot to do with economy and figth against terror.

    I hope an wish i am wrong and you are right?

    Best Regards

    Saburi




    mazda rx7 fc. Images mazda rx7 fd3s
  • Images mazda rx7 fd3s


  • mbawa2574
    07-07 07:47 PM
    Can Patton Boggs do better? Haven't we had more legislative success, I mean traction, when we partnered with Quinn Gillespie? Are we receiving sound advice on which of our grievances require legislative action and which ones can be redressed by a mere change in policy on the part of the executive? It looks like most of our current problems were not ushered in by any new law, but rather by a stroke of a pen in a memo by the incompetent and indifferent INS, USCIS, DOL and the State Department. No change in law was needed to make then deny us concurrent filing in Oct 2005 and allow it in July 2007. No change in law was required to deny us visa revalidation. One could argue that no change in law is required to belatedly use unused visas from the previous years. The list goes on. It should be easier to lobby a handful of buffoons in the executive branch with real power than 500+ buffoons on Capitol Hill. Has Patton Boggs served us well?

    We are hitting the wrong doors. We are not doing anything which gives us some visibility with media and politicians or administration. Time is running out guys




    2011 2011 Mazda Rx7 Fc. in his mazda rx7 fc. 1987 Mazda Rx7 Fc. 1987 Mazda
  • 1987 Mazda Rx7 Fc. 1987 Mazda


  • qplearn
    12-18 04:09 PM
    If we start the fasting and rallying the American people will view it as nothing but "Countries of the East" sending their millions to other countries to show their strength in numbers.

    Another thing. There was a suggestion of starting "free coaching classes" for kids as a volunteer service. Excellent Idea IFFF and ONLY IFFF we are doing it With the actual intent of providing education to the under-priviledged. Otherwise, once immigrants' voices are heard, and relief comes through, guess what will happen? These coaching classes will stop dead in their tracks. This will attract NEGATIVE publicity sending a message that the so called "Volunteer Effort" was nothing but a PUBLICITY STUNT.
    one way to demonstrate our worth is for our employers to come out and speak loudly. i am trying to get my employer to do exactly this. but we need new ideas.

    BTW: sidenote: in all these years of reading about Gandhi, and I am a big fan of history, I have never heard of a mountain called "Gandhigiri." Exactly where is this mountain located? :)



    more...

    mazda rx7 fc. Mazda Rx7 (fc)
  • Mazda Rx7 (fc)


  • yabadaba
    08-10 12:40 PM
    no receipts for me too :( r Williams 7:55am 07/02

    i m going go drinking to drown my sorrows soon.




    mazda rx7 fc. Mazda RX7 RD3S 13B Twin Turbo
  • Mazda RX7 RD3S 13B Twin Turbo


  • optimystic
    09-10 04:32 PM
    To the commenter who red dotted with the comment

    "bas*$%^&d - Take it easy. Either u want the system the way it is, or if u want it reformed, someone else has the equal right to get the benefit. I want the people with oldest PD's to get GC first; but please be nice to others.
    "

    I dont think I said anywhere in my post that I don't want "someone else to have the equal right to get benefit"...

    What I actually said was in fact that everyone (not just some lucky ones) should have the equal right to get fair benefit within the scope of the existing set of rules that USCIS has itself put in place (Honoring PDs etc).

    Please read posts carefully before commenting. And I personally usually refrain from giving red dots and comments in the backgroudd (Somehow it just seems a bit cowardly to me..but that's just my personal opinion).

    And as far as bas*$%^&d, it was just a way of expression...Haven't you heard the phrase "You lucky bastard"

    ...although I agree people could percieve some element of frustration in there...and hence the 'no offence' additive in the brackets in my original post.

    I would rather be frustrated at USCIS which richly deserves everone's anger/frustration, than at some unknown lucky bas*$%^&d :D

    Now please go ahead and give me some greens so I can become eligible for the IV chat feature.... :D

    Btw, I also came across a 'red dot vigilante', who gave me a red dot with the comment "I usually give red dots to people who complain about red dots" . (This was for some other post). Nice work sir...You seem to have a lot of time on your hands to do some vigilante work on the side lines :) . Please give some red dots to USCIS :D



    more...

    mazda rx7 fc. Sombrero de Mazda RX7 FC Gorra
  • Sombrero de Mazda RX7 FC Gorra


  • chisinau
    11-18 08:27 AM
    Hi!
    I have the opportunity to receive Canadian Permanent Residence. But for the US my PD is Sept.2006 in EB3, schedule "A"(which does not exists anymore :-). The question is: Will I be able to pass the interwiev succesfully and receive the GC, when my PD is current? Or it is impossible after receiving Canadian PR? I mean is it possible to have both Canadian PR and US GC at the same time? If now, please suggest how should I act in this situation?
    Thanx for you opinions!




    2010 Images mazda rx7 fd3s mazda rx7 fc. Second generation (FC)
  • Second generation (FC)


  • unseenguy
    02-09 10:19 PM
    So many idiots here who dont know what marriage means and use their wives as a "maid" for their housework.



    more...

    mazda rx7 fc. CAR FEATUREgt;gt;V8 MAZDA RX7:
  • CAR FEATUREgt;gt;V8 MAZDA RX7:


  • apb
    03-06 05:16 PM
    Few observations based on thread postings
    1) Last year around this same time not many RFE/LUD were seen.
    2) Most of these cases with RFE/LUD are either EB2 around 2005-2006 or EB3 2003-2004
    3) My Lawyer based out of IL confirming RFEs are in high volume and majority of these are Employment verification with Birth verification and Health letter verification as close second.

    Now given the gov attitude and the current scenario it does not seem that they would be interested in pre-adjudication. There is something else that is going on. On the same note I am also seeing that people with dates which could possibly be current anytime this year are not seeing any LUD/RFE. If pre-adjudicating is the objective than these cases should have received the RFEs first.

    Just my observation. Any input is appreciated.




    hair 1987 Mazda Rx7 Fc. 1987 Mazda mazda rx7 fc. On the Trailer: Mazda RX7.
  • On the Trailer: Mazda RX7.


  • pappu
    08-15 02:17 PM
    America has always been a favorite destination for immigrants. .
    thanks. could you PM me your name and email address



    more...

    mazda rx7 fc. mazda rx7 fc convertible.
  • mazda rx7 fc convertible.


  • priti8888
    07-23 04:08 PM
    That gives me some hope..My PD is EB3 India Oct 2004...I am filing 485 now..hope I get GC in 2 years from now!!!!


    I am sure you'll get GC by the end on this year or early next year. I might have called USCIS abt 15-20 times and from what I understand dates would retrogress for eb3 India, but not horribly. My guess in of the total applications in August 30% have older PD 02/03/04. Becuause pf PERM processing majority are 05/06/07.




    hot Mazda Rx7 (fc) mazda rx7 fc. Rx7 FC Savanna y RX7 FD
  • Rx7 FC Savanna y RX7 FD


  • gc_wow
    02-23 06:43 PM
    What about TSC processing dates,is that wrong too.



    more...

    house 1987 JDM Mazda RX7 FC 13B mazda rx7 fc. Mazda Rx7 (fc)
  • Mazda Rx7 (fc)


  • iamreddy1
    01-05 06:04 PM
    My labour was filed in Dec 2004 With Boston DOL. I got my 45 day letter form philli processing center in aug 2006.




    tattoo Mazda RX7 RD3S 13B Twin Turbo mazda rx7 fc. Shine Auto Mazda RX7 FC
  • Shine Auto Mazda RX7 FC


  • Rajeev
    08-12 02:18 PM
    My guess is that we have discussed enough about the bill. Next in the line is the dream act for children of undocumented immigrants. Do we want to have a campaign to add children of legal immigrants to the bill or we want to only discuss the implications about the act, once it is passed by house and senate.



    more...

    pictures Sombrero de Mazda RX7 FC Gorra mazda rx7 fc. Shine Auto Mazda RX7 FC
  • Shine Auto Mazda RX7 FC


  • snathan
    08-23 02:33 PM
    There is a difference, my friend. Porting to EB2 means you have to spend LOTS of $$$ and time and effort to get masters degree.
    No matter how you look at it, it is not wise to hack away at any door that's open to all. We should look at expanding our vistas, not shrink it. What if I tell you I am thinking of starting up a co in India, so some day I can make it here using the EB1 route? Why do you want to prevent me from availing this opportunity and making my sacrifices -- just because you feel it will help YOU move forward by ONE INCH?

    How about people are using it as a loop hole and smack you down. Just because you have the option, it does not mean the right thing.




    dresses Rx7 FC Savanna y RX7 FD mazda rx7 fc. Mazda RX7 FC3S DMAX +25MM Wide
  • Mazda RX7 FC3S DMAX +25MM Wide


  • ssss
    08-11 03:08 PM
    I was planning to mail the letters, but I got my I-140 approval on 08/08. So I didnot send the letters



    more...

    makeup CAR FEATUREgt;gt;V8 MAZDA RX7: mazda rx7 fc. 1987 JDM Mazda RX7 FC 13B
  • 1987 JDM Mazda RX7 FC 13B


  • EkAurAaya
    04-30 03:15 PM
    Hahaha... Oppenheim just got caught in his words by that guy ... yoooooo!
    Care to elaborate... for the audio/visually deprived :)




    girlfriend Shine Auto Mazda RX7 FC mazda rx7 fc. Mazda RX7 FC3S 13B Turbo Front
  • Mazda RX7 FC3S 13B Turbo Front


  • snathan
    08-12 11:51 AM
    This will infact increase offshoring.

    These companies will pay the extra fees, but will change their onshore/offshore model. Will use less H1/L1 visas , but will increase the headcount of offshore operations.

    So the smart senator will force more jobs to be outsourced. These jobs will never comeback once gone. If we look back at the 2000 recession, it caused a major shift in the way US companies looked at outsourcing. Pre-2000 many companies didn't believe that all jobs could be outsourced. 2000 recession forced them to think otherwise.

    These kind of bills will cause a re-thinking in corporate america's thought process. They will think of creative ways to outsource. Against this senator's hopes, it will reduce jobs here.

    Not true. Whatever they can outsource, its already gone. There are certain position where the clients demand onsite resource. I am not supporting this bill in anyway, I hate infy as much as I hate this bill. Remember these companies did not leave any stone unturned, milked the client every possible way and expoilted the employees to the maximum extent. In one another post - VLDRao was saying these companies does the tax filing on behalf the emoloyee, get the refund and again claim that tax in india using double taxation aoivdance treaty.




    hairstyles mazda rx7 fc convertible. mazda rx7 fc. Mazda RX7 FC3S Carbon OEM Door
  • Mazda RX7 FC3S Carbon OEM Door


  • pankajkakkar
    08-08 12:17 PM
    Stuck for years
    In the debate over illegal immigration, don't forget the many legal immigrants waiting for their turn.

    by Pankaj Kakkar

    Legislators in Congress are as divided over the issue of illegal immigration as Americans are. Opinions are strong, debate is passionate, and no end is in sight. Proponents of quick reform, from both sides of the divide, stress the urgency of the issue and the need for a solution soon. In this debate, however, the plight of legal immigrants is forgotten.

    The path to legally acquiring US residency and eventual citizenship is long and unnecessarily complicated, yet many deserving immigrants attempt it every year. Legal immigrants are roughly divided into two categories - family based immigrants and employment based immigrants. These immigrants face years of waiting due to anachronistic laws, discriminatory quotas, onerous bureaucratic hurdles and paper files needlessly being pushed through the system. They also face mounting legal and other tangible and intangible costs. Through all this, they work hard, pay their taxes, and live upright, lawful lives. It is in the interest of the United States as a whole, and Americans individually, to expedite the immigration process for both employment based and family based immigrants.

    The benefits are easier to see for employment based immigration. This category has attracted the best researchers and entrepreneurs of the world for the last half century. Immigrants from this category have started companies that employ hundreds of thousands of Americans (with some of these companies featured in the Fortune 500 list). Others have done research and invented technologies that have earned them the highest awards in their fields, such as the Nobel Prize. Even those who haven't been as successful have been an indispensable part of America's economic growth and progress, especially in technology, over the last half century. In my country of birth, India, the phenomenon of the best minds leaving for the US was called the "brain drain" - it isn't hard to see that India's "brain drain" is but America's "brain gain".

    Family based immigrants also benefit the US, although in less economically tangible ways. The best minds of the world, immigrating to the US through the first category, would be most comfortable and most productive in an environment where they're close to their family. These family members themselves contribute to American society by being productive, law abiding, and patriotic citizens.

    Typical legal immigrants have to wait 5-10 years, and some family based immigrants as long as 20-25 years, before they can even get a Green Card, after which another 5 year wait for acquiring citizenship ensues. These long waits have already persuaded several potential immigrants, many of whom could have been founders of Fortune 500 companies or Nobel Prize winners themselves, to go back to their countries of origin. Quite a few have also immigrated or are considering immigrating to countries where immigration laws are friendlier and less bureaucratic, such as Canada, Ireland and the U.K. While legal immigrants benefit the United States greatly, America does them, and herself, a disservice by making them suffer through an interminable immigration process and countless bureaucratic hurdles. America can and should do right by them.

    Congressman Shadegg (R-AZ) has introduced a bill, called the SKIL (Securing Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership) Act, in the House of Representatives. This bill, which has 9 Republican co-sponsors, including Congressman Mike Pence (R-CO), a leader on the issue of immigration, will significantly ameliorate the wait times and hurdles that legal immigrants face, while also benefiting the American economy by making sure that the technology leaders of tomorrow innovate and invent in the United States, and not elsewhere in the world. A similar bill has already passed the Senate. The House should consider it soon, and pass it as well.
    =================
    Added by pappu
    Published on oct 02, 2006
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=27239#post27239

    http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=71b07f51db4b780d19530 b364b3d6b9f

    news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=71b07f51db4b780d19530 b364b3d6b9f




    Green.Tech
    06-04 02:11 PM
    Thanks to all who contributed...

    Others...wake up!




    akhilmahajan
    10-22 10:36 AM
    Folks I sent email to this address as stated "uscis-complaint@dhs.gov", got bounced back saying it as a wrong email. Does nay one know the correct email to send USCIS complaints to?

    "USCIS-COMPLAINT" <uscis-complaint@dhs.gov>
    You have emailed an inactive account.
    If you are inquiring about the status of documentation you have filed with USCIS, or have a complaint relating generally to the nature of the customer service you have been provided by USCIS, please use our National Customer Service phone number 1-800-375-5283 or visit our website at www.uscis.gov.

    If you are a CIS employee and wish to file a complaint regarding credible allegations of criminal misconduct or of very serious misconduct by a USCIS employee, guidance can be found online at htttp://osi.uscis.dhs.gov/. Credible allegations of minor but significant misconduct should be reported directly to the office where you believe they may have occured.

    Same thing happened with me.
    Anyways will be sending out the letters today so should be fine.

    GO I/WE GO.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment