needhelp!
03-25 04:12 PM
Hey folks who signed up for advocacy days: I am so proud of you! You signed up for the good of all of us. I heard some of you are not confirming your participation. This cannot be an option at this point!
After all the effort IV has put in in securing the appointments, I, V, We all are counting on you. You had the best intentions when you signed up and we appreciate that, now we need you to finish grad school without being a drop out.
Many hundreds of hours have gone into organizing this event and not having folks at a meeting that has been confirmed is bad PR for IV and disappointing, sad and frustrating for the people who have been working tirelessly. Can't have it, can't tolerate it. You guys must follow through on your commitment!!!!
PM me if you have some pressing issue and maybe we can muster up some help to pull you through..
After all the effort IV has put in in securing the appointments, I, V, We all are counting on you. You had the best intentions when you signed up and we appreciate that, now we need you to finish grad school without being a drop out.
Many hundreds of hours have gone into organizing this event and not having folks at a meeting that has been confirmed is bad PR for IV and disappointing, sad and frustrating for the people who have been working tirelessly. Can't have it, can't tolerate it. You guys must follow through on your commitment!!!!
PM me if you have some pressing issue and maybe we can muster up some help to pull you through..
wallpaper Eva Longoria Inverted Bob
man-woman-and-gc
04-22 12:50 PM
Can someone please respond?
mn1975
05-09 11:59 AM
Hello
Is there a time limit within which one has to enter US after he/she gets a tourist visa (B2)
any help is appreciated
thanks
Is there a time limit within which one has to enter US after he/she gets a tourist visa (B2)
any help is appreciated
thanks
2011 Black Funky Bob Hairstyles.
Macaca
02-17 04:49 PM
This thread is for resources on Legislation
"All Legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." (Article I, Section 1, of the United States Constitution (http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html))
"All Legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." (Article I, Section 1, of the United States Constitution (http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html))
more...
cparbelle
06-15 11:59 PM
Hello!
My case:
H1B current until Jan 2010
Nationality: French
PERM approved last April
The lawyer is planning to file this week for i131-i765-i485 (target is wednesday)
Would it be ok for me to travel abroad next week, or are there some travel restrictions after we file the forms?
Do we need an official receipt from USCIS before I can leave the US, or before I came back from the US, or any other restrictions?
Would some of you know?
:)
Thanks!!
celine
My case:
H1B current until Jan 2010
Nationality: French
PERM approved last April
The lawyer is planning to file this week for i131-i765-i485 (target is wednesday)
Would it be ok for me to travel abroad next week, or are there some travel restrictions after we file the forms?
Do we need an official receipt from USCIS before I can leave the US, or before I came back from the US, or any other restrictions?
Would some of you know?
:)
Thanks!!
celine
today24
11-17 07:54 PM
Hi,
I am going back to India by next week. But my L1B extension is still pending (We applied for ext., before it expired and recieved RFE and responded. So as of now its more then 6 months from the date of I-94 expired and still my petition is in process).
My question is,
- while going back, do I need to show the copy of reciept in Port of Entry? (as I need to return my I-94 which is expired long back)
- Will it create any problem when I apply for extension again?
(My employer say, it shouldn't be a problem as I will have Approved/Denial notice which prove that I maintained legal status)
Or is it worth to wait here until I get the decision? (as I may cross 240 days by Jan, I am not sure whether the decision will come before that)...
Please adivce.
I am going back to India by next week. But my L1B extension is still pending (We applied for ext., before it expired and recieved RFE and responded. So as of now its more then 6 months from the date of I-94 expired and still my petition is in process).
My question is,
- while going back, do I need to show the copy of reciept in Port of Entry? (as I need to return my I-94 which is expired long back)
- Will it create any problem when I apply for extension again?
(My employer say, it shouldn't be a problem as I will have Approved/Denial notice which prove that I maintained legal status)
Or is it worth to wait here until I get the decision? (as I may cross 240 days by Jan, I am not sure whether the decision will come before that)...
Please adivce.
more...
NIW_Engineer
03-23 02:03 PM
I think if she didn't indicate that she intended to do CP in her I-140, but rather indicated she intended to do AOS in the US, then it will be a pain in the neck to switch to CP
2010 African American Bob Hairstyle
glus
11-02 09:27 AM
I130 petition shows an "immigrant intent" so that could come up as a ground of not allowing a person into the U.S. on a purely non-immigrant visa. I would suggest to speak to an attorney.
more...
chee
10-27 09:56 AM
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: This case has been sent to another office for processing because it has jurisdiction over the case.
On October 6, 2008, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to our LOS ANGELES, CA location for processing because they now have jurisdiction over the case. This case has been sent to our LOS ANGELES, CA location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
Current Status: This case has been sent to another office for processing because it has jurisdiction over the case.
On October 6, 2008, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to our LOS ANGELES, CA location for processing because they now have jurisdiction over the case. This case has been sent to our LOS ANGELES, CA location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
hair Inverted Bob Haircuts
Saikrishna
08-20 04:03 PM
NJ, NY Guys,
Please be prepared to come for the Sept 18 rally at DC...please inform to IV CORE TEAM asap who are "REALLY" interested in attending rally.
PLEASE DONT BE FREE RIDER (BROWSING this website for your SELFISH purposes:mad:)...OPEN YOUR MIND AND THOUGHT AND COME FOR THE RALLY !!!!
HELP YOURSELF TO GET GREEN CARD BY PARTICPATING THIS HUGE RALLY...
WE NEED "100,000" OR MORE PEOPLE HERE !!!
AWAKE AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKNANDA
Please be prepared to come for the Sept 18 rally at DC...please inform to IV CORE TEAM asap who are "REALLY" interested in attending rally.
PLEASE DONT BE FREE RIDER (BROWSING this website for your SELFISH purposes:mad:)...OPEN YOUR MIND AND THOUGHT AND COME FOR THE RALLY !!!!
HELP YOURSELF TO GET GREEN CARD BY PARTICPATING THIS HUGE RALLY...
WE NEED "100,000" OR MORE PEOPLE HERE !!!
AWAKE AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKNANDA
more...
Lord Goldeneyes
04-29 03:45 PM
lol... true enough... the other one was the chick they use for advertising.. she is actually holding a pizza slice, but you cant really see it...
hot Medium Length Bob Hairstylequot;
Macaca
11-16 08:35 AM
Pelosi: War, Immigration Hurt Public Approval of Congress (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/15/AR2007111501631.html) Speaker Says Clinton Can 'Hold Her Own' By David S. Broder and Chris Cillizza | Washington Post Staff Writers, November 15, 2007
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today blamed Congress' failure to bring an end to the war in Iraq and deal effectively with the reform of immigration laws as the primary causes of the institution's near-record low approval ratings.
In an interview at the U.S. Capitol, Pelosi said the Democratic takeover of Congress had raised expectations on action to end the conflict in Iraq, and that the Senate's initial willingness to tackle immigration reform followed by its failure to do so left the American public disappointed in Congress.
The House on Wednesday night passed spending legislation that sought to tie funding for the Iraq war to hard deadlines for beginning troop withdrawals, a proposal that has little hope of passage in the Senate.
"People thought it was a problem that could be solved and when it didn't happen I think it was a big disappointment," she said. "Usually those low numbers relate to expectations and there were high expectations" on both Iraq and immigration.
Pelosi made her comments in an interview for washingtonpost.com's "PostTalk" program (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2007/11/15/VI2007111501443.html?hpid=topnews), just hours before seven of her party's presidential candidates are scheduled to gather in Las Vegas for a televised debate.
Pelosi said that the heavy wave of criticism directed at Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) in recent days stemmed from her status as the frontrunner, not as the lone woman in the race. "I believe that any 'picking on' ... [of] Senator Clinton has to do with her being a frontrunner," she said. "Frontrunners always have to undergo that."
Pelosi, who had a chance to closely evaluate six of the candidates at last weekend's Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Iowa (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/11/AR2007111101732.html), said that she saw up close that night that Clinton can "hold her own."
Discussing her own rise to the speakership, Pelosi said she did little to emphasize her gender in lining support within the caucus. "The last thing I could have said to any of my colleagues would have been: 'Vote for me because we need a woman in the leadership.'"
On Wednesday night, the House narrowly passed a measure -- 218 to 203 -- that would tie funding for the Iraq war to a specific redeployment plan for the troops in the country.
Pelosi cast the Bush administration's plan to draw down 30,000 American troops from the country as "inadequate," arguing that such a proposal would leave more soldiers in Iraq next year than were there in November 2006.
Citing a story in Thursday's Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/14/AR2007111402524.html), Pelosi said that leading U.S. generals have concluded that the stubbornness of the Shiite government in Iraq is causing more problems than al Qaeda or other insurgent groups. "The government is not taking political steps," said Pelosi.
While Pelosi said she hoped the House action would help move the debate forward, she acknowledged that Senate action on the bill was unlikely.
Pelosi sounded a conciliatory note on the current spending showdown with the White House but repeatedly referenced the President's much larger requests for Iraq funding when discussing Democratic priorities like children's health insurance and medical research.
She did, however, express confidence that a deal would be reached with the president on the remaining appropriations bills -- dismissing the possibility of a repeat of the 1995-1996 government shutdown that left House Republicans deflated and President Clinton triumphant.
While admitting that she must do a better job at ensuring the American people are aware of what the Democratic-led House has accomplished in its first 10 months, she expressed confidence that her party's brand was still strong.
She repeatedly cited polling that showed Democrats with a double-digit leads over their Republican counterparts in both specific battleground congressional districts as well as nationally.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today blamed Congress' failure to bring an end to the war in Iraq and deal effectively with the reform of immigration laws as the primary causes of the institution's near-record low approval ratings.
In an interview at the U.S. Capitol, Pelosi said the Democratic takeover of Congress had raised expectations on action to end the conflict in Iraq, and that the Senate's initial willingness to tackle immigration reform followed by its failure to do so left the American public disappointed in Congress.
The House on Wednesday night passed spending legislation that sought to tie funding for the Iraq war to hard deadlines for beginning troop withdrawals, a proposal that has little hope of passage in the Senate.
"People thought it was a problem that could be solved and when it didn't happen I think it was a big disappointment," she said. "Usually those low numbers relate to expectations and there were high expectations" on both Iraq and immigration.
Pelosi made her comments in an interview for washingtonpost.com's "PostTalk" program (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2007/11/15/VI2007111501443.html?hpid=topnews), just hours before seven of her party's presidential candidates are scheduled to gather in Las Vegas for a televised debate.
Pelosi said that the heavy wave of criticism directed at Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) in recent days stemmed from her status as the frontrunner, not as the lone woman in the race. "I believe that any 'picking on' ... [of] Senator Clinton has to do with her being a frontrunner," she said. "Frontrunners always have to undergo that."
Pelosi, who had a chance to closely evaluate six of the candidates at last weekend's Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Iowa (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/11/AR2007111101732.html), said that she saw up close that night that Clinton can "hold her own."
Discussing her own rise to the speakership, Pelosi said she did little to emphasize her gender in lining support within the caucus. "The last thing I could have said to any of my colleagues would have been: 'Vote for me because we need a woman in the leadership.'"
On Wednesday night, the House narrowly passed a measure -- 218 to 203 -- that would tie funding for the Iraq war to a specific redeployment plan for the troops in the country.
Pelosi cast the Bush administration's plan to draw down 30,000 American troops from the country as "inadequate," arguing that such a proposal would leave more soldiers in Iraq next year than were there in November 2006.
Citing a story in Thursday's Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/14/AR2007111402524.html), Pelosi said that leading U.S. generals have concluded that the stubbornness of the Shiite government in Iraq is causing more problems than al Qaeda or other insurgent groups. "The government is not taking political steps," said Pelosi.
While Pelosi said she hoped the House action would help move the debate forward, she acknowledged that Senate action on the bill was unlikely.
Pelosi sounded a conciliatory note on the current spending showdown with the White House but repeatedly referenced the President's much larger requests for Iraq funding when discussing Democratic priorities like children's health insurance and medical research.
She did, however, express confidence that a deal would be reached with the president on the remaining appropriations bills -- dismissing the possibility of a repeat of the 1995-1996 government shutdown that left House Republicans deflated and President Clinton triumphant.
While admitting that she must do a better job at ensuring the American people are aware of what the Democratic-led House has accomplished in its first 10 months, she expressed confidence that her party's brand was still strong.
She repeatedly cited polling that showed Democrats with a double-digit leads over their Republican counterparts in both specific battleground congressional districts as well as nationally.
more...
house inverted bob haircut.
albnfsjia
10-04 11:37 AM
hi
i want to learn expression blend more!
i did not know some source that will help me in blend
i mean some source that teach by deeply .
i want to learn expression blend more!
i did not know some source that will help me in blend
i mean some source that teach by deeply .
tattoo of inverted bob hairstyle
kinvin
01-28 02:40 PM
Greetings,
Can fellow forum members suggest any Stamford,CT area lawyers whose services they have availed off. I am looking to get a second opinion, independent of my company�s lawyer.
Thanks.
Can fellow forum members suggest any Stamford,CT area lawyers whose services they have availed off. I am looking to get a second opinion, independent of my company�s lawyer.
Thanks.
more...
pictures short trendy ob hairstyle
Redeye
01-15 11:54 AM
I have one white I 94 which you get at the port of last entry and three H1 I 94 (one original H1 I 94, two extention I 94s). The latest I 94 goes till 2010. Should I surrender all four I 94s or just the expired ones or just the white one.
Please suggest.
Please suggest.
dresses tattoo short curl hairstyle inverted short inverted bob hairstyles. inverted
JunRN
01-16 08:47 AM
What is your PD and your country of chargeability? Is it EB1, EB2, or EB3?
more...
makeup Short-haircuts | Bob
ParanoidAndroid
02-25 08:33 PM
you want to learn how to use 3d programs..or just swift3d?
try here 3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/ (http://3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/)
try here 3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/ (http://3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/)
girlfriend inverted bob haircut.
csvinay
06-10 02:50 PM
Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhEl6HdfqWM&feature=dir
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhEl6HdfqWM&feature=dir
hairstyles The inverted bob is
fittan
07-25 02:46 PM
Hi,
I just filed I-485 for myself and my wife. She is currently on OPT and has an approved EAD (F-1).
I can't seems to get a definite answer on how the filing will affect her status. Here's what I know so far, pls correct me if I am wrong:
1) F-1 is non-immigrant intent. Hence, when the I-485 is submitted she is no longer on F-1 but "AOS pending" status.
2) She "can" continue to work using the EAD. I said "can" because technically she is not supposed to but this is a grey area.
3) The PROBLEM is when she decides to travel. There is high risk that the immigration officer will see that she has filed I-485 and hence her F-1/OPT is no longer valid.
4) The PROBLEM in (3) can be circummvent if she uses AP from the I-485 application.
Am I missing anything? Thanks.
Fittan
I just filed I-485 for myself and my wife. She is currently on OPT and has an approved EAD (F-1).
I can't seems to get a definite answer on how the filing will affect her status. Here's what I know so far, pls correct me if I am wrong:
1) F-1 is non-immigrant intent. Hence, when the I-485 is submitted she is no longer on F-1 but "AOS pending" status.
2) She "can" continue to work using the EAD. I said "can" because technically she is not supposed to but this is a grey area.
3) The PROBLEM is when she decides to travel. There is high risk that the immigration officer will see that she has filed I-485 and hence her F-1/OPT is no longer valid.
4) The PROBLEM in (3) can be circummvent if she uses AP from the I-485 application.
Am I missing anything? Thanks.
Fittan
logiclife
03-23 11:24 PM
If you are working/Living in Tennessee please urgenly email with you name and phone number to
jay@immigrationvoice.org
aman@immigrationvoice.org
rajesh@immigrationvoice.org
This is VERY VERY IMPORTANT and please do it promptly. We need your help RIGHT AWAY as we have a good chance at making a difference in the next few days.
Please do not hesitate and come forward. You can also call us at 281-576-7185.
--Jay.
jay@immigrationvoice.org
aman@immigrationvoice.org
rajesh@immigrationvoice.org
This is VERY VERY IMPORTANT and please do it promptly. We need your help RIGHT AWAY as we have a good chance at making a difference in the next few days.
Please do not hesitate and come forward. You can also call us at 281-576-7185.
--Jay.
indyanguy
07-16 10:20 PM
I applied for Substitute Labor/140/485/EAD concurrently on July 2nd. Assuming, USCIS will accept my 485, I have a few questions:
1. If I get a RFE/NOID/denial on labor/140, will I be eligible for invoking AC21?
2. Is the EAD processed after 140 approval or is it possible I would get EAD before labor/140 approval?
Can someone explain how things work when one applies for Sub labor/140/485 concurrently?
Thanks!
1. If I get a RFE/NOID/denial on labor/140, will I be eligible for invoking AC21?
2. Is the EAD processed after 140 approval or is it possible I would get EAD before labor/140 approval?
Can someone explain how things work when one applies for Sub labor/140/485 concurrently?
Thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment